A systematic reference for selecting tool steel and surface coatings for fine blanking dies. Covers cold-work tool steels (D2, SKD11, DC53, SLD), high-speed steel, tungsten carbide, powder metallurgy grades, PVD and CVD coatings, the hardness-toughness-wear triangle, typical die life ranges by workpiece material, and die-to-workpiece matching recommendations.
Fine blanking is not conventional blanking. The tool sees a loading regime that no other sheet-metal process imposes, and the die steel must be selected for that regime.
In a triple-action fine blanking press, three forces act on the strip simultaneously. The punch force shears the material through nearly 100% of its thickness — unlike conventional blanking, which fractures through roughly half. The V-ring counterpressure (typically 30–60% of the blanking force) presses a sharp V-shaped indenter into the strip around the die opening, creating a hydrostatic stress state that suppresses fracture and forces the material to flow plastically. The ejector force holds the part against the punch face during the stroke and strips it from the punch on return.
This combination loads the tool in three ways at once. The cutting edge sees abrasive wear as hard carbide particles and non-metallic inclusions in the workpiece slide past it at high contact pressure. The edge also sees adhesive wear (galling) as the workpiece material cold-welds to the tool surface and tears away, carrying tool material with it. And the V-ring indenter and punch edge see cyclic compressive stress with each stroke — millions of cycles — that can initiate fatigue cracks at the edge and propagate into chipping.
Conventional stamping dies can often use a general-purpose tool steel because the loading is dominated by a single mechanism (usually abrasion) and the stroke count is lower. Fine blanking requires a die steel that resists all three mechanisms simultaneously, and that retains its edge geometry under millions of high-force cycles. This is why die steel selection is one of the three primary determinants of fine blanking die life, alongside die design (clearance, V-ring geometry, guide system) and workpiece material quality.
The die steel also determines the maintenance strategy. A tougher grade can be re-ground more times before the die body is exhausted, because edge chips are smaller and less frequent. A more wear-resistant grade runs longer between grinds but may chip catastrophically if overloaded. The total cost of ownership — steel cost + coating cost + grinding labor + downtime — depends on getting this balance right for the specific workpiece and production volume.
The table below compares the tool steel grades most commonly used for fine blanking punches and dies. All values are industry typical reference ranges; actual hardness and performance depend on heat treatment, section size, and coating.
| Grade | Standard | Typical hardness (HRC) | Toughness | Wear resistance | Typical use in fine blanking | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D2 | AISI / ASTM A681 | 58 – 62 | Low – Medium | High | Punches and dies for low- to medium-carbon steel, low-to-medium volume runs | High carbon (1.5%) and high chromium (12%) give excellent wear resistance but lower toughness. Prone to edge chipping under high V-ring counterpressure. Cost-effective for low-volume parts. Industry typical reference. |
| SKD11 | JIS G4404 | 58 – 62 | Medium | High | General-purpose fine blanking punches and dies for medium-carbon steel | JIS equivalent to D2 with slightly modified chemistry. Widely available in Asia. Good wear resistance, moderate toughness. Often used with TiCN or AlCrN coating. Industry typical reference. |
| DC53 | JIS G4404 (Daido proprietary) | 60 – 64 | High | High | Preferred for fine blanking punches where chipping is the dominant failure mode; medium- and high-carbon steel | Modified SKD11 with lower carbon and higher molybdenum/vanadium. Significantly higher toughness than D2/SKD11 at equivalent hardness — approximately 2× impact toughness. Can be hardened to 62–64 HRC while retaining chipping resistance. Industry typical reference. |
| SLD | JIS G4404 (Hitachi proprietary) | 58 – 62 | Medium | High | General-purpose cold-work tool steel for punches and dies | Hitachi brand equivalent to SKD11/D2. Good dimensional stability during heat treatment. Available in improved variants (SLD-Magic) with higher toughness. Industry typical reference. |
| SKH-9 / M2 | JIS G4403 / AISI M2 | 62 – 66 | Medium | Very High | Punches for high-carbon and alloy steel where abrasive wear dominates; small intricate punches | High-speed steel with high tungsten, molybdenum, and vanadium content. Very high hot hardness and wear resistance. Lower toughness than DC53 — more susceptible to chipping under impact. Good for thin, sharp punch profiles. Industry typical reference. |
| Tungsten carbide (YG15 / YC20) | ISO K-group / GB | 85 – 92 HRA (≈ 66–72 HRC equiv.) | Low | Exceptional | Die inserts and punches for high-volume production of high-carbon, alloy, or stainless steel; abrasive workpiece materials | Sintered WC-Co composite. Highest wear resistance of all common die materials. Low toughness — requires rigid die set, precise alignment, and generous edge radii. Cannot be conventionally machined — requires EDM or grinding. Expensive but cost-effective at high volume. Industry typical reference. |
| Powder metallurgy steel (S390 / ASP23) | Böhler / Uddeholm proprietary | 62 – 66 | High | Very High | High-performance punches and dies for high-volume, high-wear applications; complex profiles | Produced by powder metallurgy (PM) — uniform carbide distribution, no segregation, isotropic properties. Combines high wear resistance with high toughness, approaching carbide wear resistance with steel-like toughness. Excellent edge stability. Premium cost. Industry typical reference. |
All hardness, toughness, and wear resistance values are industry typical reference ranges, not a quality commitment. Hardness conversion between HRC and HRA follows ASTM E140 industry standard conversion data. Toughness and wear resistance ratings are relative qualitative comparisons within the table, not absolute measurements. Actual performance depends on heat treatment parameters, section thickness, surface finish, coating, die design, lubrication, and workpiece material quality.
How to read the grade table. The grades are ordered roughly from lowest cost / lowest performance (D2) to highest cost / highest performance (powder metallurgy steel and carbide). The selection decision is not simply "pick the best" — it is "pick the grade whose failure mode matches the application." If the dominant failure is edge chipping (common in thick parts, high V-ring pressure, or intermittent production), prioritize toughness: DC53 or PM steel. If the dominant failure is abrasive wear (common in high-carbon steel, stainless steel, or high-volume runs), prioritize wear resistance: SKH-9/M2, carbide, or PM steel. If the dominant failure is galling (common in low-carbon steel and austenitic stainless), prioritize coating and surface finish over substrate grade.
Why DC53 is the fine blanking workhorse. DC53 occupies a sweet spot in the property triangle. Its chemistry — approximately 1.0% C, 8.0% Cr, 2.0% Mo, 0.3% V — is a deliberate modification of SKD11 that reduces the large primary chromium carbides responsible for low toughness, while retaining enough alloy content for high hardenability and wear resistance. The result is a steel that can be hardened to 60–62 HRC (higher than D2's typical 58–60) while delivering roughly twice the unnotched impact toughness. In fine blanking, where edge chipping under V-ring counterpressure is often the life-limiting factor, this toughness advantage translates directly into longer intervals between re-grinds and more re-grinds before die exhaustion.
These three properties cannot all be maximized in a single tool steel. Fine blanking requires understanding which one is the life-limiting factor for a given application.
Hardness and wear resistance. In general, higher hardness means higher resistance to abrasive wear. A tool steel at 62 HRC will wear more slowly than the same steel at 58 HRC when sliding against an abrasive workpiece. This is because abrasive wear occurs when hard particles in the workpiece (cementite, alumina inclusions, oxide scale) plastically deform the tool surface and micro-machine it. A harder substrate resists this micro-machining. However, the relationship is not linear — above approximately 62 HRC for conventional cold-work tool steel, the incremental wear resistance gain diminishes while the toughness loss accelerates.
Hardness and toughness. This is the fundamental tradeoff. As hardness increases, fracture toughness (KIC) and impact toughness decrease. A D2 die at 64 HRC may have an impact toughness of 5–8 J, while the same steel at 58 HRC may have 12–18 J. DC53 at 62 HRC typically achieves 15–25 J — comparable to D2 at 58 HRC — which is why DC53 can be run harder without chipping. Powder metallurgy steels break this tradeoff somewhat because their uniform, fine carbide distribution avoids the large carbide particles that act as crack initiation sites in conventionally cast tool steel.
Why higher hardness is not always better in fine blanking. The V-ring counterpressure in fine blanking creates a loading condition that conventional stamping does not. The V-ring indenter is a sharp edge that is pressed into the strip under 30–60% of blanking force on every stroke. This subjects the indenter edge to high cyclic compressive stress combined with a bending moment as the strip material flows past it. If the tool steel is too hard (and therefore too brittle), micro-cracks initiate at the edge surface — often at carbide-matrix interfaces — and propagate inward with each stroke. Once a crack reaches a critical length, a section of the edge breaks off (chipping), and the shear face quality degrades immediately.
A chipped edge cannot be restored by polishing — it requires a full re-grind that removes material from the entire cutting face. If chipping occurs frequently, the die is exhausted after fewer re-grinds, and the total cost of ownership rises even though the wear rate between chipping events is low. This is why a DC53 punch at 60–62 HRC often outlasts a D2 punch at 62–64 HRC in fine blanking: the DC53 wears slightly faster but chips much less frequently, and the total number of good parts between tool changes is higher.
The optimum point. For most fine blanking of medium-carbon steel (0.30–0.50% C) at 2–5 mm thickness, the industry typical reference optimum is DC53 or SKD11 at 58–62 HRC with a PVD coating. The substrate provides the toughness to resist chipping, and the coating provides the surface hardness (2,000–3,500 HV) to resist abrasive wear. This layered approach — tough substrate + hard coating — is the most effective way to break the hardness-toughness triangle because it puts each property where it is needed: toughness in the bulk to resist crack propagation, hardness at the surface to resist wear.
For a deeper understanding of how workpiece microstructure interacts with tool loading, refer to the fine blanking material requirements complete guide, which covers spheroidization, hardness bands, and inclusion control from the workpiece side.
PVD and CVD coatings are applied after final grinding and polishing. They raise surface hardness, reduce friction, and provide a chemical barrier against workpiece material transfer. The table below compares the coatings most commonly used on fine blanking tooling.
| Coating | Typical thickness (µm) | Hardness (HV) | Friction coefficient (vs steel) | Best for | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiN (Titanium Nitride) | 1 – 3 | 1,800 – 2,300 | 0.4 – 0.5 | General-purpose, low-carbon steel, low-to-medium volume | Gold-colored. The first-generation PVD coating. Lower hardness and higher friction than TiCN or AlCrN. Prone to oxidation above ~500°C. Lowest cost. Good for mild abrasion and moderate galling. Industry typical reference data. |
| TiCN (Titanium Carbonitride) | 1 – 3 | 2,500 – 3,200 | 0.2 – 0.3 | Medium-carbon steel, general fine blanking, abrasive wear | Gray-black. Carbon addition raises hardness and lowers friction compared to TiN. Good all-round coating for fine blanking of medium-carbon steel. Oxidizes above ~400°C. Most widely used fine blanking coating. Industry typical reference data. |
| AlTiN (Aluminum Titanium Nitride) | 1 – 4 | 2,800 – 3,500 | 0.3 – 0.4 | High-carbon steel, alloy steel, high-temperature applications | Dark gray. Aluminum content provides excellent hot hardness and oxidation resistance up to ~900°C. Higher hardness than TiCN but slightly higher friction. Good for high-wear, high-heat conditions. Can be brittle at high thickness. Industry typical reference data. |
| AlCrN (Aluminum Chromium Nitride) | 1 – 4 | 2,800 – 3,400 | 0.25 – 0.35 | Stainless steel, high-carbon steel, severe galling and abrasion | Dark gray. Chromium-based coating with excellent oxidation resistance (up to ~1,100°C) and good lubricity. Particularly effective on austenitic stainless steel where work-hardening and galling are severe. Good edge stability. Industry typical reference data. |
| DLC (Diamond-Like Carbon) | 0.5 – 2 | 1,500 – 3,000 | 0.05 – 0.15 | Low-carbon steel, aluminum, copper, galling-dominant applications | Black / amorphous. Extremely low friction coefficient — the key advantage. Reduces adhesive galling dramatically on soft, ductile materials. Lower hardness than nitride coatings. Thin coating (typically ≤2 µm) because thicker DLC has high internal stress and delaminates. Not recommended for highly abrasive workpieces. Industry typical reference data. |
| CrN (Chromium Nitride) | 1 – 5 | 1,600 – 2,200 | 0.3 – 0.4 | Corrosive environments, forming dies, mild blanking | Silver-gray. Good corrosion resistance and toughness. Lower hardness than TiCN. Often used as a base layer or for applications where corrosion resistance matters more than maximum wear resistance. Less common in fine blanking than TiCN or AlCrN. Industry typical reference data. |
All coating thickness, hardness, and friction coefficient values are industry typical reference data. Hardness is measured at the coating surface per ASTM E384 or ISO 14577 (instrumented indentation). Friction coefficient is measured against uncoated steel in a pin-on-disk test per ASTM G99 — actual friction in fine blanking depends on lubrication, surface finish, and contact pressure. Coating performance varies by deposition process (arc evaporation, sputtering, PACVD), coating vendor, and substrate preparation.
PVD vs CVD for fine blanking. Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) is the dominant coating process for fine blanking tooling because it operates at lower temperatures (typically 180–500°C) and does not distort the precision-ground die geometry. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) operates at higher temperatures (800–1,000°C) and produces thicker, more wear-resistant coatings, but the high temperature can cause dimensional distortion and requires re-grinding after coating — which removes the coating from the cutting edge. For these reasons, CVD is rarely used on fine blanking punches and dies; PVD is standard.
Coating selection by failure mode. Match the coating to the dominant wear mechanism. If the die fails by abrasive wear (visible wear land on the cutting edge, increasing burr height), choose a high-hardness coating: TiCN, AlTiN, or AlCrN. If the die fails by galling (material pickup on the punch, smeared shear face, increasing blanking force), choose a low-friction coating: DLC or AlCrN. If the die fails by chipping, the coating is not the solution — reduce substrate hardness, switch to a tougher grade (DC53 or PM steel), or optimize die design (increase edge radius, reduce V-ring pressure). A coating cannot compensate for a substrate that is too brittle.
Coating and re-grinding. When a coated die is re-ground, the coating is removed from the ground surface (typically the flank face). The rake face may retain its coating, but the newly ground flank must be re-coated to restore full performance. Stripping and re-coating is standard practice — most PVD coatings can be stripped with a chemical or plasma process and re-applied 3–5 times before the die dimensions are exhausted. Always re-coat after every re-grind; running a partially coated die accelerates wear on the uncoated flank.
Die life is expressed in strokes (parts produced) between tool changes or re-grinds. The table below gives industry typical reference ranges by workpiece material carbon level. Actual life depends on die design, clearance, V-ring geometry, lubrication, press condition, and material quality.
| Workpiece material | Typical punch life (strokes) | Typical die life (strokes) | Main failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low carbon (≤ 0.12% C) e.g. SAE1010, SPCC, DC01 | 1.5 – 4.0 million | 3.0 – 8.0 million | Adhesive galling on punch; material pickup. DLC or TiCN coating most effective. Lowest press load, cleanest shear face. Industry typical reference. |
| Medium carbon (0.30 – 0.50% C) e.g. SAE1035, SAE1045, C45 | 0.8 – 2.0 million | 1.5 – 4.0 million | Combined abrasive wear and galling. TiCN or AlCrN on DC53/SKD11. Edge chipping possible if V-ring pressure is high. Industry typical reference. |
| High carbon (0.70 – 0.85% C) e.g. SAE1078, C67S, C75S, 65Mn | 0.3 – 0.8 million | 0.6 – 1.5 million | Abrasive wear from high cementite volume. Tungsten carbide or PM steel with AlCrN. Higher press tonnage required. Industry typical reference. |
| Alloy / spring steel (0.50 – 0.70% C + Cr/Mn/V) e.g. 51CrV4, 65Mn, 50CrV4 | 0.2 – 0.6 million | 0.4 – 1.2 million | Abrasive wear from alloy carbides + chipping from higher strength. PM steel or carbide with AlCrN. Narrow process window. Industry typical reference. |
| Stainless steel (austenitic / ferritic) e.g. 304, 316, 430 | 0.15 – 0.5 million | 0.3 – 1.0 million | Severe work-hardening and galling. AlCrN or DLC on high-toughness substrate. High blanking force, frequent lubrication required. Industry typical reference. |
All die life values are industry typical reference ranges, actual life depends on die design, lubrication, press condition and material quality. Punch life is typically shorter than die (female) life because the punch sees higher contact stress and is more vulnerable to chipping. Die life is typically 1.5–3× punch life. Life ranges assume DC53/SKD11 substrate with TiCN or AlCrN coating for low/medium carbon, and carbide or PM steel with AlCrN for high carbon/alloy/stainless. Life assumes fully spheroidized workpiece strip with controlled hardness and low inclusion rating — partially spheroidized or high-inclusion strip can reduce life by 30–50%.
How to use the life table. These ranges are planning estimates, not guarantees. Use them to estimate tooling cost per part and to set preventive maintenance intervals. For example, if you are fine blanking SAE1078 steel strip at 3.0 mm for a clutch plate, plan for punch re-grinds at approximately 300,000–500,000 strokes and die re-grinds at 600,000–1,000,000 strokes. If actual life falls below the lower bound, investigate: is the strip fully spheroidized? Is the hardness within the 160–200 HB band? Is the die clearance correct? Is lubrication adequate? Is the press parallelism within spec? Any one of these can halve die life.
The workpiece material factor. Notice that die life drops by an order of magnitude from low-carbon to stainless steel — from 4 million to 150,000 strokes. This is not primarily because the die steel is inadequate; it is because the workpiece material becomes more abrasive (higher carbide volume), more prone to galling (higher ductility and work-hardening rate), and stronger (higher blanking force). The single most effective way to extend die life for a given workpiece grade is to improve the workpiece material quality: full spheroidization, tight hardness control, low inclusion rating, and consistent thickness. This is where HS-FINEB strip quality directly impacts the tooling budget.
The table below matches workpiece grade families to recommended die steel and coating combinations. These are industry typical reference starting points — always validate with trial blanking before committing to production tooling.
| Workpiece grade family | Recommended die steel | Recommended coating | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-carbon steel SAE1010, SPCC, DC01 (≤ 0.12% C) | DC53 or SKD11 at 58–60 HRC | DLC or TiCN | Galling is the dominant failure — DLC's low friction (0.05–0.15) is highly effective. TiCN is a lower-cost alternative. Punch life 1.5–4M strokes. Used for door locks, brackets, clips. See automotive seat recliner applications for related low/medium-carbon parts. |
| Medium-carbon steel SAE1035 / SAE1050, C45 (0.30–0.50% C) | DC53 at 60–62 HRC (preferred) or SKD11 at 58–62 HRC | TiCN or AlCrN | Combined abrasion and galling. DC53's toughness resists chipping under V-ring pressure. TiCN is the standard all-round choice; AlCrN for higher wear. Punch life 0.8–2M strokes. Used for seat recliner sectors, transmission plates, gears. |
| High-carbon steel SAE1078, C67S / C75S (0.70–0.85% C) | DC53 at 60–62 HRC (medium volume); Tungsten carbide YG15 or PM steel S390 (high volume) | AlCrN or AlTiN | High cementite volume causes severe abrasive wear. Carbide or PM steel required for runs above ~500K strokes. AlCrN provides hot hardness and edge stability. Punch life 0.3–0.8M strokes. Used for clutch plates, saw blade bodies. |
| Spring / alloy steel 65Mn, 51CrV4, 50CrV4 | PM steel S390/ASP23 or Tungsten carbide YC20 | AlCrN | Alloy carbides (Cr, V, Mo) are harder than cementite and more abrasive. High workpiece strength increases blanking force and edge stress. PM steel's uniform carbide distribution resists chipping better than conventional HSS. See clutch disc spring applications. Punch life 0.2–0.6M strokes. |
| Stainless steel 304, 316, 430 | DC53 at 58–60 HRC (low volume); PM steel or carbide (high volume) | AlCrN or DLC | Austenitic stainless work-hardens rapidly and galling is severe. AlCrN's high hot hardness and chemical inertness resist material transfer. DLC for low-friction on ferritic grades. High lubrication requirement. Punch life 0.15–0.5M strokes. |
All recommendations are industry typical reference starting points. Die steel and coating selection must be validated by trial blanking with the actual workpiece coil, because material quality variation (spheroidization ratio, hardness uniformity, inclusion rating) significantly affects die life. For high-volume production, consult a tooling engineer with fine blanking experience and consider a graded tooling approach — carbide inserts at high-wear stations, DC53 at lower-wear stations — to optimize total tooling cost.
The graded tooling approach. In a multi-station fine blanking die (piercing, blanking, forming, coining), different stations see different loading and wear rates. A cost-effective strategy is to use the highest-performance material only where it is needed: tungsten carbide or PM steel at the main blanking station and piercing stations with small punches (high stress), and DC53 or SKD11 at forming, coining, and guide stations. This reduces tooling cost compared to making the entire die from carbide, while maintaining die life at the critical stations. The HS-FINEB fine blanking steel product range covers all the workpiece grades referenced in this table, with full MTC documentation per coil.
Die steel and coating are only half the die-life equation. The workpiece strip's microstructure, hardness consistency, inclusion content, and dimensional uniformity directly determine how quickly the tool wears and chips.
Uniform spheroidized carbide distribution. The single most important workpiece characteristic for die life is the morphology of the cementite carbides. In fully spheroidized strip, the carbides are globular (rounded) particles uniformly dispersed in a soft ferrite matrix. As the punch edge shears through the material, these rounded particles rotate and slide past the tool edge — they cause minimal abrasive wear. In partially spheroidized or lamellar-pearlite strip, the carbides are plate-like with sharp edges. These plates fracture during shear deformation and the sharp fragments act as micro-abrasives, gouging the tool edge and accelerating wear. A carbide plate that is only a few micrometers long can remove more tool material in a single stroke than a hundred globular carbides.
HS-FINEB spheroidized fine blanking strip is processed to achieve ≥90% globular cementite with uniform particle size (typically 0.5–2.0 micrometers) and even distribution across the strip thickness and width. This uniform carbide distribution is the primary mechanism by which HS-FINEB strip reduces die wear compared to conventionally annealed or partially spheroidized strip.
Controlled hardness band (160–200 HB). Hardness variation across the coil causes intermittent shock loading on the tool. When a hard section (e.g. 205 HB) follows a soft section (e.g. 165 HB), the blanking force spikes suddenly, subjecting the punch edge to an impact load that can initiate micro-cracks. Over millions of strokes, these micro-cracks propagate into chipping. HS-FINEB controls the as-delivered hardness to a 160–200 HB band with within-coil uniformity ≤20 HB, measured at head, middle, and tail of each coil. This consistency means the blanking force is stable stroke to stroke, eliminating the shock loads that cause edge chipping.
Low non-metallic inclusion rating. Non-metallic inclusions — alumina (Al₂O₃), silicates, globular oxides, and sulfides — are harder than the steel matrix and act as abrasive particles at the tool-workpiece interface. A single large alumina inclusion crossing the cutting edge can cause a visible wear notch. HS-FINEB specifies inclusion ratings per ASTM E45 (thin-series) with B (alumina) and D (globular oxide) ratings ≤2.0 for precision fine blanking strip. This low inclusion content directly reduces micro-abrasive wear at the cutting edge and extends the interval between re-grinds.
Consistent thickness tolerance and flatness. Strip thickness variation changes the V-ring penetration depth. If the strip is thicker at one point, the V-ring penetrates less and the counterpressure is lower — the material is not fully constrained, and the punch sees higher bending stress at the edge. If the strip is thinner, the V-ring over-penetrates and the indenter wears faster. HS-FINEB holds thickness to IT8–IT9 tolerance (±0.010 to ±0.030 mm depending on gauge) and flatness to ≤5 I-units for precision grade, ensuring consistent V-ring penetration and uniform tool loading across the entire coil.
Quantified impact. In production trials comparing fully spheroidized, uniform-carbide strip to partially spheroidized strip of the same grade (SAE1078, 2.0 mm) and same hardness range (170–190 HB), the fully spheroidized strip delivered 20–40% longer punch life before the burr height reached the rejection limit. The difference was attributable to reduced abrasive wear (uniform globular carbides vs fragmented lamellar carbides) and reduced edge chipping (consistent hardness vs intermittent hardness spikes). For a production run of 500,000 parts, this translates to one fewer punch re-grind and approximately 8–12 hours of reduced downtime.
For the full specification of HS-FINEB spheroidized strip — including spheroidization ratio, hardness bands, inclusion ratings, and dimensional tolerances — refer to the fine blanking material requirements complete guide and the spheroidizing annealing complete guide. For grade-specific product data, see the HS-FINEB fine blanking steel product range.
These resources cover the workpiece material side of die life, the spheroidizing process behind uniform carbide distribution, and the specific steel grades referenced in this die steel guide.
The workpiece-side specification that determines die wear: carbon window, spheroidization ≥90%, hardness bands, inclusion ratings, flatness and acceptance checklist.
Temperature cycles, hold times, cooling rates and furnace atmosphere control — the process that produces uniform globular carbide distribution and reduces die wear.
HS-FINEB spheroidized fine blanking steel strip in SAE1010, SAE1035, SAE1078, 65Mn, C67S and C75S, with full MTC per coil and controlled carbide distribution.
How die wear, chipping, and clearance drift produce burr on the shear face — and how tooling maintenance and workpiece quality interact to control burr height.
Include part function, thickness × width, annual volume, workpiece grade and current die life. Our engineers reply within one working day with a die steel, coating, and expected life estimate, plus a workpiece strip specification to maximize die life.